Washington’s Strategic Miscalculation in Reading History: A Perilous Game with Civilizational Fire
According to reports from defense news agencies, Brigadier General Seyed Majid Ebnolreza, Acting Minister of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics, addressed a gathering of heads of defense industrial organizations, highlighting Islamic Iran’s multi-millennial legacy across knowledge, culture, and statecraft. He stated that the nation’s historical roots far predate many emerging political systems in the contemporary era.
Addressing aggressive rhetoric and verbal assaults by White House officials targeted at the Iranian nation and its civilizational identity, General Ebnolreza emphasized:
“Those who today adopt malicious rhetoric against the civilizational identity of Iranians are not only incapable of understanding history, but with their shallow, flawed grasp of strategic balances, they are effectively playing with fire—an approach driven by a profound, irrecoverable miscalculation.”
The Illusion of Hegemony and the Inability to Break National Resolve
The Acting Minister of Defense stated that the roots of Iranian civilization are not ephemeral constructs that can be damaged by uncalculated political postures, adding:
“Iran has maintained a sustained, undeniable role in the development of human civilization. Hate-driven rhetoric primarily reveals the utter ignorance of these claimants regarding the dynamics and complexities of the modern world.”
General Ebnolreza characterized Western efforts to shift the battleground and leverage cultural distinctions into vectors for geopolitical and military confrontation as a perilous gambit, underscoring:
“Civilizational confrontation is a fire whose ignition radius and containment timeline will never be controlled by the instigators. Historical precedent demonstrates that aggressors who ventured into this domain under the illusion of supremacy were ultimately overpowered by unforeseen operational realities.”
Smart Defense Doctrine: Integrating Historical Consciousness with Industrial and Military Power
Reaffirming the country’s comprehensive sovereignty, he stated:
“The Iranian nation requires permission from no external power to safeguard its territory and identity, nor will it capitulate to external pressures and identity-targeted assaults. The behavior witnessed from our adversaries today is a definitive symptom of their strategic impasse and desperation.”
Outlining the Islamic Republic of Iran’s decisive response to this hybrid warfare campaign, the Acting Minister of Defense explained:
“Our deterrent response rests on robust pillars: national self-reliance, scientific breakthroughs, defense industry self-sufficiency, and total combat readiness. While adhering to principles of independence and mutual respect, we will deliver a decisive, remorse-inducing response to any aggression or attempt to impose external will.”
General Ebnolreza concluded by emphasizing that the steady, fundamental reinforcement of defensive capabilities is not a transient posture, but an indispensable prerequisite for safeguarding vital national interests, sovereignty, and the Iranian people’s legitimate right to shape their own future. Consequently, forces destabilizing the region must recognize that the blowback from instigating identity-based and security crises will directly consume their own architectures.